HLTH 8051E Week 6 Discussion: Continuum of Care Scenario: Team A Discussion 3
This Discussion aligns to the NCHL domain of Relations. Specifically, it focuses on the second level of the Team Leadership competency: “Keeps People Informed.” For more information on how this icon aligns to the NCHL Health Leadership Competency Model 3.0, refer to the MHA Iconography page.
For this team Discussion, you will have the opportunity to review the work of others and provide them with peer-reviewed feedback, as well as consider how their continuum of care might be improved. Further, you will be able to compare and contrast the other countries identified by your team members, outside of the United States, that are recognized for aligning reimbursement with value, the third element of a value-based care model.
In this Discussion, you will continue to analyze your continuum of care scenario using the value-based care model, the IOM Aims, and a country comparison. You will continue to work with Team A and share your suggestions for improvements. Then, you will provide peer-review feedback on your colleagues’ suggestions, and they will do the same for you. This feedback will be incorporated into the Week 6 Assignment, which you should continue to update this week.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
To prepare for this Discussion:
- Continue to collaborate with Team A to ensure that each member of your team receives peer-review feedback from at least two colleagues.
- Locate your Community Profile and Continuum of Care document that you developed in Week 3 and return to your continuum of care scenario. Research how your community and specific diagnosis relate the following:
- The value-based care element of: Aligning reimbursement with value.
- The IOM Aim of: Be safe.
- Additionally, research and identify a country outside of the United States that has a healthcare delivery model that closely aligns with the value-based care element of “aligning reimbursement with value.”
By Wednesday
Post your evaluation of a continuum of care scenario and country comparison based on your Week 3 Community Profile and Continuum of Care scenario, to address the following:
- In one sentence, briefly identify the city/state in which your health community is located, the specific diagnosis for your identified health issue, and the country you used as a comparison.
- Using at least one scholarly source, propose at least one improvement that could be made based on the following element of the value-based care model:
- Aligning reimbursement with value
- Using at least one scholarly source, propose at least one improvement that could be made based on the following IOM Aim:
- Be safe
- Using at least one scholarly source, compare your community’s model of healthcare delivery to the delivery model of the country that closely aligns with the value-based care element of “aligning reimbursement with value.” What lessons—positive or negative—could your community learn from the other country?
Read the postings from each member of your team, even if you are not intending to provide peer-review feedback to each member. Consider how your colleagues’ postings relate to the information presented in the Learning Resources and to your own posting.
Refer to the Week 6 Discussion Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this grading rubric to assess your work.
By Friday
Provide peer-review feedback to at least two colleagues based on what you came across in your research, to include the following:
- Evaluate your colleague’s initial post (focusing on the value-based care element, IOM Aim, and country comparison) and provide constructive feedback that is supported by your research.
Note: Be sure that your perspectives are supported with evidence.
By Sunday
Respond to at least two postings by members of your group as follows:
- Continue engaging in the Discussion.
- Follow up on the peer feedback that was provided to you.
- Review the feedback that was provided to other colleagues and provide your perspective based on what you came across in your research.
SOLUTION HLTH 8051E Week 6 Discussion: Continuum of Care Scenario: Team A Discussion 3
Hello Class,
Improvements to the Continuum of Care in Phoenix for Unintentional Injuries
In Phoenix, Arizona, unintentional injuries—particularly traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) caused by motor vehicle accidents—present a significant public health issue. The city’s urban sprawl, outdoor recreational activities, and high traffic volume contribute to the high prevalence of TBIs. To improve the continuum of care for these injuries, Phoenix can focus on enhancing outcome tracking and promoting the effectiveness of interventions across healthcare settings….
Kindly click the purchase icon below to buy the full solution at $5
(FINAL ANSWER) HLTH 8051E Week 7 Discussion: Continuum of Care Scenario: Team B Discussion 1